Ofcom and Social Media: the Beginning of the End of Free Speech

Effort to shut down political opposition masquerading as noble effort to protect the children. 

Boris Johnson, like Trump, is a phony populist. His political stepping stone to the position of PM was Brexit. He is a British blue blood raised au pair in the bucolic English countryside. Johnson identifies as a “conservative” but holds mandatory liberal social beliefs, including the sacred touchstone, LGBT “rights” (above and beyond the natural rights every human on the planet is born with). 

The political class in the United “Kingdom” is serious about fully eliminating natural rights. The British state plans to squash the right of the British people to speak their minds, an effort headed up by a woman who has not held a real job her entire life. 

“Dame” Melanie Dawes is a career “civil servant” so valuable to the state she was awarded the “Honorable” Order of the Bath, a prize lorded over by the “Sovereign,” Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles. She was recently appointed boss at the UK telecoms regulator Ofcom and will preside over the organization’s “Online Harms” legislation designed to strip not only Brits of the right to disagree with the state but billions of people abroad as the law will punish social media giants for allowing the politically and socially incorrect to post online. 

The control freaks in Parliament are slavering in anticipation over the effort to make sure Brits—or anyone else on social media—tow the line. 

Mark Zuckerberg and the other social media billionaires realize allowing free speech on their platforms will result in the state stealing their money—or even throwing them in prison—and they will shut down any and all accounts not following Ofcom’s new “rules.”

Naturally, this effort to shut down political opposition is masquerading as a noble effort to protect the children. 

The BBC, a long-standing propaganda conduit established by “Royal Charter,” reported on Wednesday:

Ofcom will have the power to make tech firms responsible for protecting people from harmful content such as violence, terrorism, cyber-bullying and child abuse—and platforms will need to ensure that content is removed quickly.

Once upon a time, it was the responsibility of parents to shield and protect their children from harmful content, now that responsibility has been taken up by the state and a legion of bureaucrats, “dames,” “sirs,” “baronesses,” “lords,” and associated “honorable” control freaks and sociopaths in the upper echelon of the British government. The connected effort to silence the plebs and commoners is marching under a banner calling for protecting the children (state sociopaths love this meme—only criminals oppose protecting the children). 

Julian Knight, chair elect of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee which scrutinises social media companies, called for “a muscular approach” to regulation.

“That means more than a hefty fine—it means having the clout to disrupt the activities of businesses that fail to comply, and ultimately, the threat of a prison sentence for breaking the law,” he said.

In a statement, Facebook said it had “long called” for new regulation, and said it was “looking forward to carrying on the discussion” with the government and wider industry.

Ah, yes, the “muscular approach,” the same approach used to punish Julian Assange for the crime of exposing the murderous character of the USG. He is being tortured and systematically reprogrammed in the UK’s Belmarsh prison. 

Other states are in the process of sanitizing the internet, making sure fact-checking the stream of lies and misinformation put out by various ministries of truth will no longer be tolerated. 

Germany introduced the NetzDG Law in 2018, which states that social media platforms with more than two million registered German users have to review and remove illegal content within 24 hours of being posted or face fines of up to €50m (£42m).

Australia passed the Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Material Act in April 2019, introducing criminal penalties for social media companies, possible jail sentences for tech executives for up to three years and financial penalties worth up to 10% of a company’s global turnover.

China blocks many western tech giants including Twitter, Google and Facebook, and the state monitors Chinese social apps for politically sensitive content.

Indeed, China—the largest and most successful authoritarian state in the world—is the model for not only the end of open and free internet but for the establishment of a police and surveillance state as well. David Rockefeller loved Mao’s approach to controlling the people.

There is no more serious risk to “young people’s health” than the state itself—its wars, its rigged financial and political structures, and myriad other serious social and environmental issues created and exacerbated by self-serving sociopaths who claim to be “civil servants” rather than self-seeking water carriers for a parasitical and violent state. 

creatdive commons by-sa_RGB-350x122

The Psychopath Virus

What happens to us, the clueless, naive, and child-like citizens, numbering in the billions, is of little concern. 

Dr. Francis Boyle, the man who drafted the Biological Weapons Act, believes the Wuhan Coronavirus didn’t originate in a seafood market, as the propaganda media insists, but rather escaped from a supposedly secure bioweapons lab in Wuhan. 

Boyle cites the following quote from the GreatGameIndia website. 

In a secret speech given to high-level Communist Party cadres nearly two decades ago, Chinese Defense Minister Gen. Chi Haotian explained a long-range plan for ensuring a Chinese national renaissance… He said there were three vital issues that must be grasped. The first was the issue of living space—because China is severely overpopulated and China’s environment is deteriorating. The second issue, therefore, is that the Communist Party must teach the Chinese people to “go out.” By this Gen. Chi meant the conquest of new lands in which a “second China” could be built by “colonization.” From this arises the third vital issue: the “issue of America.”

The website claims the “ruling Chinese Communist Party” (which is not communist; Karl Marx would be rolling over in his grave—the “Chicoms” have little to do with Marxism or Maoism for that matter; they are authoritarian crony capitalists) believes biological weapons will result in the defeat of America, which stands in the way of its version of totalitarian colonialism. 

Gen. Chi represents the height of psychopathic gamesmanship that very well may result in the end of human and possibly mammalian life on the planet. Here is the General’s rationale: 

“We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack, the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities.”

Chi said China’s economic advancement is not the key for triumph over its enemies—war is.  “Our economic development is all about preparing for the needs of war!” he said.  “Publicly, we still emphasize economic development as our center, but in reality, economic development has war as its center!”

There is plenty of evidence China stole the Coronavirus from a lab in Canada and turned around and weaponized it, presumably to use against its mortal enemy, the USG. 

The “mainstream media,” in actuality a finely tuned propaganda mouthpiece for the ruling elite, want you to believe this deadly virus emerged unexpected from a dead and live animal market in Wuhan (they characterize it as a seafood market). Boyle and others know this is a cover story and pure bullshit. 

Forget the cover story. This is all about the USG and the misnamed “Chicoms” fighting to gain world dominance. Both nation-states are controlled by seriously disturbed psychopaths bent on world domination. What happens to us, the clueless, naive, and child-like citizens, numbering in the billions, is of little concern. 

It is yet to be determined what damage the Coronavirus will ultimately have on world population. This is of little concern to the ruling psychopaths. They believe there are too many useless eaters on the planet, a planet they consider their personal property. If the Coronavirus takes a toll similar to that of the 1917 influenza, that’s not a problem, it’s an offertory to Moloch, Kronos, or whatever pagan deity these psychopaths worship (if any at all). 

I’d suggest reading the Georgia Guidestones. Our rulers want a world population no larger than 500 million people. If the misnamed Chicoms manage to kill off a few hundred million people with their bioweapon virus, so much the better for the elite who have no use for us. 

Our ancestors built the most prosperous civilization in history and the elite are now in the process of stealing all the wealth and rending the social and political fabric. If most of us die in a bio or nuclear war, so much the better for them. They will be safe in their bunkers. 

creatdive commons by-sa_RGB-350x122

All-Caps Bette and the Kazak Bots

Midler and the libs are batshit crazy.

Bette Midler, the washed-up Hollywood actor and singer, warned us a couple days ago that they’re out to deceive and mislead us with “malicious content.” So imperative is her message, Midler posted it in all-caps, the textual equivalent to screaming. 

The Hollywood elite, wealthy and liberal, insist you believe without question the fact-free idea Russia, China, and—out in left field, according to Midler—mysterious “Kazaks” are working together to undermine “democracy” in America. 

I think she means Russian Cossacks. Or maybe she means the Kazakhs of Central Asia. It’s difficult to tell when people so effortlessly slide into delusion, deception, and eagerly buy into lies without question or even suspicion. 

Here’s the truth, and I don’t need all-caps to get my point across: this Russian bot nonsense was invented by the elite and adopted by its political class after the surprise election victory of Donald Trump, who fooled millions of people into believing he would end the wars and drain the fetid DC swamp. 

Democrats can’t stand the thought of this crony capitalist loudmouth being reelected, so they’re pushing the ludicrous Russian collusion story that should have died with the deflated mess that was the Mueller investigation. 

The “impeachment” of Trump is a farce. It will never make it out of the Senate and this will drive Midler—and middle finger and anger management candidate De Niro—and all the other self-deluded libs bonkers. 

It is predicted the impeachment farce will have the opposite result of what House Democrats intend—it might work to get Trump reelected. 

If that happens, all hell will break loose, and millions suffering from the micro aggressions of political reality will go into the street. It won’t be pretty. 

creatdive commons by-sa_RGB-350x122

Steve Bannon, China, and the Committee on the Present Danger 4.0

A transition from Islamic to Chinese enemies.

Steve Bannon is making himself useful. According to The New York Times, he has rekindled the paranoiac fire that fed the Cold War military-industrial complex and stoked red hysteria far and wide.

This is the fourth iteration of the Committee on the Present Danger. The first committee was originally formed in 1950 and produced the founding document of the manufactured Cold War—NSC-68, written by Paul Nitze. 

He later wrote the Gaither Report. It argued that “nuclear deterrence”—including the insane idea of a nuclear first strike—was more important than protecting the public from a nuclear war through diplomacy, treaty, and the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction. Members of Nitze’s anti-detente group ended up in the Reagan administration.

Following Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq invasions and the commencement of the never-ending war on terror, the third CPD was formed and began a process of neoconization with the inclusion of Joe Lieberman, former CIA boss James Woolsey, neocon ideologue Laurie Mylroie, neocon founder Norman Podhoretz, Islamophobe Frank Gaffney, AEI adjunct fellow Danielle Pletka, and other associates of the American Enterprise Institute, Heritage Foundation, American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, and the Boeing Company (see this web archived page).

The fourth and current iteration was established in March. It includes Bannon. The vice-chairman, remarkably, is the fringe neocon Frank Gaffney. CFR member and Claremont Institute fellow Mark Helprin, former CIA spook Clare Lopez, the aforementioned Woolsey, and Jianli Yang are also members. Yang is a mascot of sorts for the revived CPD’s anti-China agenda. He is said to be a survivor of the Tiananmen Square Massacre of 1989. 

From the current CPD website:

“The Committee on the Present Danger: China” is a wholly-independent and non-partisan effort to educate and inform American citizens and policymakers about the existential threats presented from the Peoples Republic of China under the misrule of the Chinese Communist Party. Its purpose is to explain these threats that range from: the PRC’s accelerating military buildup; its active information and political warfare that targets the American people and our business, political and media elites; cyber warfare; and, economic warfare. 

In other words, the latest CPD is little different than its predecessors. It is primarily a propaganda apparatus to transition the forever war state away from past enemies—the Soviet Union, Islamic terrorism—and focus hysteria on a new and much more formidable enemy. 

Thus the need for even more military spending and the manufacture of outrageously expensive weapons systems—the F-35 boondoggle, Hellfire missiles, expeditionary seas bases, space-based weapons, missile systems galore, littoral combat ships, attack helicopters, etc., ad nauseam. 

creatdive commons by-sa_RGB-350x122

WTF Friday: The Dark Side of the Moon

I guess I’m supposed to be impressed, but I’m not. 

The chicoms have landed a probe on the dark side of the moon, now commonly called the far side. This is a first, primarily because nobody, astronomers included, give a fig about the dark side, which is as inconsequential and yawn-inspiring as the side facing us. 

Continue reading “WTF Friday: The Dark Side of the Moon”