Murder in Pittsburgh and the Targeting of Alternative Social Media

Robert Bowers, the suspected shooter at a synagogue in Pittsburgh, is being used to denounce social media not on the corporate reservation. 

Bowers had an account on Gab, the free speech social media alternative to Twitter and Facebook, where he posted antisemitic content, and this is now being used to portray the site as a haven for antisemites. 

Gab posted the following on Twitter:

I don’t believe this will work. Gab, often described as a refuge for alt-righters bounced from corporate-government social media, is targeted for destruction. 

Soon after Gab launched in 2016, the corporate media piled on, describing the site as an echo chamber for alt-righters who are, according to the propaganda media, white supremacists and Nazis down to the man and woman. 

“Gab’s appeal for that crowd is obvious,” writes Wired, a Condé Nast publication. “The only posting guidelines are no illegal porn, no threats of violence, no terrorism, and no doxing. Oh, and a fifth commandment that literally says ‘try to be nice.’ Everything else is fair game. Notably absent? Any explicit stipulations against hate speech.” 

The “hate speech” pejorative is being used to tag anybody to the right of Hillary Clinton as extremist, the sort of people who stroll into synagogues and commit mass murder. The corporate media has done an exemplary job of demonizing the alt-right as nothing more than a fringe gaggle of racists and misogynists, which is of course absurd on its face. 

The effort to shut down Gab depends on the Nazi stereotype. If you’re on Gab, as I am, it’s assumed you’re a fascist, a white supremacist, an angry white male acting violently to preserve his privilege.

Responsibility for all of this supposed hatred—arguing with a progressive is now considered aggressive and hateful—falls on Trump. 

For the Left, violence is acceptable—if it is aimed at alt-righters and others not part of the Resistance™. Hatred is all good if it’s directed at people who are 1) white, 2) male, 3) think Identity politics is pure insanity, and 4) are not Democrats or progressives, therefore Nazis.

If you believe I’m exaggerating about the effort to shut down Gab and any other social media platform not under the control of the state and its corporate partners, check out this post from Gab:

I believe some day in the not too distant future you will not be allowed an internet presence if your political views don’t align with the state and its corporate propaganda media. 

Of course, the state isn’t “progressive,” as many alt-righters tend to think. It is fascist—a melding of state and corporate power. 

The elite are exploiting a gullible Left to advance their long-term agenda: a one world government and an all encompassing surveillance state that will make real resistance—not the kind imagined by Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman Schultz—all but impossible. 

creatdive commons by-sa_RGB-350x122

One thought on “Murder in Pittsburgh and the Targeting of Alternative Social Media

  1. Step back and see the big picture. There is a pattern of this over the course of many years. The result is always the same; more state control. And because it’s fascist in nature, it includes corporate control. But it is always about control, making serfs of the general public.

    If the people valued rights, they wouldn’t tolerate it. But the people are stupid and being dumbed down more, brainwashed, confused and deprived of a values system conducive to peaceful coexistence because things like truth/reality and Liberty isn’t convenient for the state.

    I spend a lot of time thinking of how to correct it. The political answer always comes down to get rid of all forms of government everywhere, remove the element of coercion/force to impose edicts. Government must then ask permission and compete on the open market as a service. It no longer qualifies as a government, but rather a system of social organization.

    People are too stupid to figure that out and change. They continue to vote to demand and legitimize violent government, no matter the cost to theirs and others’ lives and legacy. And they do it by the billions globally.

    So, kill them all, THEN rebuild without the element of of coercion/force to impose edicts. But how do you kill 3-6 billion violent serfs? The answer is global thermonuclear war.

    So, how do you start WW3?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.